Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HABERBECK WASTE WATER D

Structure dossier · WDID 3900575 · 1 · BECK GULCH · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 19:17 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1910-03-03 — 254th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GARDEN GULCH NO 2 DITCH (1903-05-01). Immediately behind: P L R DITCH (1913-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
31031.219761910-03-031937-01-04 0.80.0 CIRR 208

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 142 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2003, came in at 79 AF — 56% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1989 209 14th lowest of 15 · 147% of median 184 0.7
1990 141 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 171 0.6
1991 164 11th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 137 1.0
1992 202 12th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 130 0.8
1993 204 13th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 116 1.4
1994 142 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 158 0.6
1995 145 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 145 0.6
1996 149 10th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 118 1.3
1997 102 3rd lowest of 15 · 72% of median 107 0.6
1998 109 4th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 105 0.6
1999 131 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 124 0.6
2000 249 15th lowest of 15 · 175% of median 175 0.8
2001 109 4th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 146 0.4
2002 65 1st lowest of 15 · 46% of median 111 0.5
2003 79 2nd lowest of 15 · 56% of median 118 0.8

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.