← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PIERSON AND HARRIS DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3900638 · 1 · EAST ELK CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1898-09-27144th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NEW HARRIS DITCH (1898-09-27). Immediately behind: EAST FORK DITCH (1888-03-03).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19306.178021898-09-271902-12-19 25.60.0 CIRRINDDOM 156A
32959.259951921-03-041943-01-11 2.20.0 CIRR 202N, 220N
51134.509481989-06-281990-12-31 0.30.0 CIRRFISFIRSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 713 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 742 AF — 104% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 590 1st lowest of 15 · 83% of median 119 3.6
2011 631 2nd lowest of 15 · 88% of median 118 3.6
2012 669 5th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 143 3.7
2013 710 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 150 4.4
2014 1,199 14th lowest of 15 · 168% of median 165 4.5
2015 776 11th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 121 3.6
2016 713 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 132 3.6
2017 975 13th lowest of 15 · 137% of median 174 4.0
2018 675 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 138 4.1
2019 738 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 137 3.3
2020 653 3rd lowest of 15 · 92% of median 104 3.5
2021 658 4th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 126 3.5
2022 853 12th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 122 4.2
2023 1,607 15th lowest of 15 · 225% of median 182 4.9
2024 742 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 157 4.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.