← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

TONIOLLI DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3900676 · 1 · WEST ELK CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 03:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1910-07-20194th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TONY PERRY DITCH (1910-07-20). Immediately behind: PARK RESERVOIR (1906-04-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
22676.221151910-07-201912-03-18 0.650.0 CIRR 179

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 95 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1998, came in at 227 AF — 239% of that, and 12th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1973 61 3rd lowest of 12 · 64% of median 59 0.9
1984 57 2nd lowest of 12 · 60% of median 36 0.8
1985 113 7th lowest of 12 · 119% of median 33 2.1
1986 113 7th lowest of 12 · 119% of median 60 1.0
1987 75 4th lowest of 12 · 79% of median 33 1.4
1988 77 6th lowest of 12 · 81% of median 32 1.4
1990 75 4th lowest of 12 · 79% of median 39 1.1
1994 49 1st lowest of 12 · 52% of median 22 1.3
1995 138 10th lowest of 12 · 145% of median 49 1.6
1996 138 10th lowest of 12 · 145% of median 49 1.6
1997 120 9th lowest of 12 · 126% of median 37 1.8
1998 227 12th lowest of 12 · 239% of median 59 2.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 508 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 9% of the irrigation seasons in 1973-1998 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.