← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WARNER DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3900690 · 1 · EAST CANYON CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1889-06-01155th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WOLVERTON MESA DITCH (1903-12-01). Immediately behind: LEWIS NO 1 DITCH (1895-06-01).

Decreed rights (6)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
20407.143971889-06-011905-11-22 0.40.0 CIRRAUG 143E
21000.209091907-04-011908-09-14 0.00.0 CIRR 175
33978.338831942-10-081952-09-05 0.00.0 CIRR 242
37503.257191920-06-011966-11-10 4.450.0 CIRRAUG 291
55517.544771999-02-252002-12-31 2.7950.0 CIRRRECSTKOTH
57708.558322002-11-112008-01-21 0.40.0 CIRRFIR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 878 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 142 AF — 16% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 979 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 144 4.7
2011 1,097 11th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 235 3.7
2012 1,783 15th lowest of 15 · 203% of median 22 366 3.9
2013 1,341 14th lowest of 15 · 153% of median 10 288 4.3
2014 1,251 13th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 190 3.8
2015 818 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 23 200 4.1
2016 878 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 143 4.1
2017 98 1st lowest of 15 · 11% of median 165 0.3
2018 204 5th lowest of 15 · 23% of median 27 244 0.6
2019 267 6th lowest of 15 · 30% of median 27 214 2.3
2020 1,033 10th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 27 214 3.6
2021 198 4th lowest of 15 · 23% of median 27 228 0.5
2022 139 2nd lowest of 15 · 16% of median 38 214 0.4
2023 1,133 12th lowest of 15 · 129% of median 38 214 3.6
2024 142 3rd lowest of 15 · 16% of median 38 214 0.6

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 6 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 12990 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 81% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.