Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
EATON PUMP & PIPELINE
Structure dossier · WDID 3900712 · 8 · COLORADO RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1950-01-07 — 355th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DRAGERT PUMP PLANT & PL (1950-01-07). Immediately behind: RIFLE GAP RESERVOIR (1951-01-10).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37503.36531 | 1950-01-07 | 1966-11-10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | COMINDDOMPWR | 303 |
| 37503.36991 | 1951-04-12 | 1966-11-10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | COMINDDOMPWR | 308 |
| 37780.0 | 1953-06-09 | 1970-11-10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECDOMPWR | 189 |
Legal record & documents
5 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
83CW0257, CA4914.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
83CW0257 | 4 | 1970-11-10 | S |
CA4914 | 1 | 1966-11-10 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 514 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1964, came in at 88 AF — 17% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 527 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 145 | 3.0 |
| 1951 | 373 | 7th lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 108 | 3.0 |
| 1952 | 875 | 15th lowest of 15 · 170% of median | 194 | 3.0 |
| 1953 | 692 | 13th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | 247 | 3.0 |
| 1954 | 274 | 4th lowest of 15 · 53% of median | 144 | 1.0 |
| 1955 | 314 | 6th lowest of 15 · 61% of median | 93 | 2.5 |
| 1956 | 272 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 53% of median | 83 | 2.0 |
| 1957 | 514 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 87 | 4.0 |
| 1958 | 567 | 11th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 128 | 4.0 |
| 1959 | 212 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 41% of median | 113 | 1.0 |
| 1960 | 543 | 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 167 | 2.0 |
| 1961 | 309 | 5th lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 163 | 1.5 |
| 1962 | 666 | 12th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | 173 | 4.0 |
| 1963 | 738 | 14th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | 156 | 3.6 |
| 1964 | 88 | 1st lowest of 15 · 17% of median | 27 | 3.8 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 3 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2028 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 65% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-1964 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.