← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SPRAGUE DITCH NO 2

Structure dossier · WDID 3900829 · 1 · WEST FORK PARACHUTE CREE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:01 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1934-06-15656th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SPRAGUE DITCH NO 1 (1934-06-15). Immediately behind: SPRAGUE DITCH NO 3 (1934-06-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
45290.308461934-06-151974-12-31 0.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 37 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 1 AF — 3% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1984 58 13th lowest of 15 · 157% of median 16 1.9
1985 71 14th lowest of 15 · 192% of median 46 1.1
1986 25 6th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 34 0.4
1987 37 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 38 0.5
1988 46 10th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 47 0.5
1989 51 11th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 62 0.4
1990 51 11th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 55 0.5
1991 44 9th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 45 0.5
1996 9 5th lowest of 15 · 24% of median 23 0.2
2007 3 4th lowest of 15 · 8% of median 3 0.7
2008 1 1st lowest of 15 · 3% of median 4 0.2
2013 1 1st lowest of 15 · 3% of median 3 0.3
2014 27 7th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 19 0.8
2017 113 15th lowest of 15 · 305% of median 77 1.0
2019 1 1st lowest of 15 · 3% of median 4 0.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.