Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SOONER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4000692 · 1 · SURFACE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:20 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1907-05-22 — 1409th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TROBOUGH NO 1 DITCH (1907-05-01). Immediately behind: REX RESERVOIR (1907-10-09).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25807.2096 | 1907-05-22 | 1930-02-10 | 15.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | G49 |
| 31924.2096 | 1907-05-22 | 1954-03-20 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | DOMSTK | J120 |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
CA3503, CA2030, CA2989.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA3503 | 1 | 1954-03-20 | S |
CA2030 | 1 | 1930-02-10 | S |
CA2989 | 1 | 1889-06-17 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 628 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 840 AF — 134% of that, and 12th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | — | no recorded volume | 524 | 0 | — |
| 2011 | 543 | 5th lowest of 14 · 86% of median | — | 70 | 7.3 |
| 2012 | 702 | 9th lowest of 14 · 112% of median | — | 90 | 7.2 |
| 2013 | 458 | 1st lowest of 14 · 73% of median | — | 67 | 6.2 |
| 2014 | 488 | 3rd lowest of 14 · 78% of median | — | 76 | 7.1 |
| 2015 | 678 | 8th lowest of 14 · 108% of median | — | 120 | 10.8 |
| 2016 | 721 | 11th lowest of 14 · 115% of median | — | 115 | 5.9 |
| 2017 | 533 | 4th lowest of 14 · 85% of median | — | 110 | 5.8 |
| 2018 | 485 | 2nd lowest of 14 · 77% of median | — | 78 | 5.1 |
| 2019 | 577 | 7th lowest of 14 · 92% of median | — | 90 | 7.2 |
| 2020 | 842 | 13th lowest of 14 · 134% of median | — | 115 | 8.6 |
| 2021 | 566 | 6th lowest of 14 · 90% of median | — | 67 | 8.1 |
| 2022 | 843 | 14th lowest of 14 · 134% of median | — | 138 | 7.4 |
| 2023 | 710 | 10th lowest of 14 · 113% of median | — | 85 | 10.3 |
| 2024 | 840 | 12th lowest of 14 · 134% of median | — | 120 | 9.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 14 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2907 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 25% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.