← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LOOP DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4000725 · 1 · WARD CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1973-01-09 — 2289th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STUCKER SPRING PIPELINE (1972-10-01). Immediately behind: END NORTH DITCH (1973-04-21).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44934.0 | 1973-01-09 | 1973-12-31 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | FIS |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 0 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 0 AF — —% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 76 | 13th lowest of 15 · —% of median | 179 | 0.3 |
| 1997 | 181 | 14th lowest of 15 · —% of median | 283 | 0.4 |
| 1998 | 208 | 15th lowest of 15 · —% of median | 365 | 0.6 |
| 1999 | 71 | 12th lowest of 15 · —% of median | 365 | 0.2 |
| 2000 | 40 | 11th lowest of 15 · —% of median | 305 | 0.1 |
| 2001 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2002 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2003 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2004 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2006 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2007 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2009 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.