Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HADLER DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4000877 · 1 · NORTH FORK ESCALANTE CRE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1892-05-01 — 653rd most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CAMPBELL DITCH (1892-01-01). Immediately behind: BLUMBERG DITCH NO. 3 (1893-04-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19773.154621892-05-011906-02-17 0.150.0 CIRR 10

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 24 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1989, came in at 10 AF — 42% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 24 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 90 0.2
1976 31 12th lowest of 15 · 129% of median 115 0.2
1977 31 12th lowest of 15 · 129% of median 162 0.1
1978 22 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 133 0.2
1979 4 1st lowest of 15 · 17% of median 26 0.1
1980 15 4th lowest of 15 · 62% of median 52 0.2
1981 15 4th lowest of 15 · 62% of median 76 0.1
1982 21 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 92 0.2
1983 40 14th lowest of 15 · 167% of median 84 0.2
1984 26 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 97 0.2
1985 29 11th lowest of 15 · 121% of median 115 0.2
1986 26 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 87 0.2
1987 40 14th lowest of 15 · 167% of median 134 0.2
1988 10 2nd lowest of 15 · 42% of median 38 0.2
1989 10 2nd lowest of 15 · 42% of median 40 0.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.