← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HARRY WALKER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4000878 · 1 · ESCALANTE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:50 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1890-03-01 — 651st most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JOHN W MUSSER DITCH (1888-12-20). Immediately behind: CAMPBELL DITCH (1892-01-01).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19773.1467 | 1890-03-01 | 1906-02-17 | 1.25 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 8 |
| 31924.224 | 1911-05-01 | 1954-03-20 | 0.75 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | J140, J141 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 452 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 330 AF — 73% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 630 | 13th lowest of 15 · 139% of median | 161 | 3.0 |
| 2011 | 452 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 138 | 2.0 |
| 2012 | 656 | 14th lowest of 15 · 145% of median | 149 | 4.0 |
| 2013 | 992 | 15th lowest of 15 · 220% of median | 152 | 5.5 |
| 2014 | 400 | 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 143 | 2.5 |
| 2015 | 480 | 11th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 138 | 2.5 |
| 2016 | 335 | 4th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 141 | 2.8 |
| 2017 | 518 | 12th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 141 | 4.5 |
| 2018 | 469 | 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median | 151 | 2.5 |
| 2019 | 339 | 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 138 | 2.5 |
| 2020 | 241 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 53% of median | 109 | 1.2 |
| 2021 | 126 | 1st lowest of 15 · 28% of median | 73 | 1.0 |
| 2022 | 478 | 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 194 | 2.0 |
| 2023 | 356 | 6th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | 99 | 2.5 |
| 2024 | 330 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 147 | 1.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.