← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MOREY DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4000889 · 1 · CUMMINGS GULCH · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1919-04-20 — 1447th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ARTHUR L. MARTIN DITCH (1917-05-01). Immediately behind: METZGER DITCH (1919-08-10).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25807.25311 | 1919-04-20 | 1930-02-10 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | G92 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 329 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2012, came in at 464 AF — 141% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 301 | 5th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 161 | 1.0 |
| 1993 | 269 | 1st lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 159 | 1.0 |
| 1994 | 305 | 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 169 | 1.0 |
| 1995 | 309 | 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 173 | 1.0 |
| 1996 | 293 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 169 | 1.0 |
| 1997 | 329 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 181 | 1.0 |
| 1998 | 391 | 9th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 205 | 1.0 |
| 1999 | 535 | 11th lowest of 15 · 163% of median | 245 | 1.5 |
| 2000 | 881 | 15th lowest of 15 · 268% of median | 281 | 2.5 |
| 2001 | 581 | 12th lowest of 15 · 177% of median | 179 | 2.5 |
| 2002 | 620 | 13th lowest of 15 · 188% of median | 143 | 2.5 |
| 2003 | 737 | 14th lowest of 15 · 224% of median | 182 | 2.5 |
| 2004 | 290 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 150 | 1.0 |
| 2005 | 300 | 4th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 140 | 3.5 |
| 2012 | 464 | 10th lowest of 15 · 141% of median | 182 | 1.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.