← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SCHAFER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4000901 · 1 · GUNNISON RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:39 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1905-06-01 — 2304th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STRATTON SPRINGS 1 2 3 P (1904-06-01). Immediately behind: TODD RESERVOIR SPRING NO. 2 (1905-07-10).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45290.2024 | 1905-06-01 | 1974-12-31 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRSTK | |
| 45349.0 | 1974-02-28 | 1974-12-31 | 0.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 95 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2003, came in at 333 AF — 350% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | 103 | 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 40 | 2.0 |
| 1990 | 95 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 35 | 2.0 |
| 1991 | 91 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 34 | 2.0 |
| 1992 | 87 | 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 35 | 2.0 |
| 1993 | 67 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 26 | 2.0 |
| 1994 | 107 | 11th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 40 | 2.0 |
| 1995 | 75 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 79% of median | 31 | 2.0 |
| 1996 | 95 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 36 | 2.0 |
| 1997 | 36 | 1st lowest of 15 · 38% of median | 15 | 2.0 |
| 1998 | 171 | 14th lowest of 15 · 180% of median | 56 | 2.0 |
| 1999 | 82 | 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 50 | 2.0 |
| 2000 | 83 | 5th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 86 | 0.5 |
| 2001 | 115 | 12th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 87 | 1.0 |
| 2002 | 147 | 13th lowest of 15 · 155% of median | 85 | 1.0 |
| 2003 | 333 | 15th lowest of 15 · 350% of median | 91 | 2.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.