← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CURRANT CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4000919 · 1 · LEROUX CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1883-08-0452nd most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ORCHARD RANCH DITCH (1883-05-09). Immediately behind: COW CREEK DITCH (1883-08-11).

Decreed rights (29)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12269.01883-08-041889-06-17 7.00.0 CIRR 2
12276.01883-08-111889-06-17 0.00.0 CIRR 3
12285.01883-08-201889-06-17 0.00.0 CIRR 4
12467.01884-02-181889-06-17 0.00.0 CIRR 6
13119.01885-12-011889-06-17 0.00.0 CIRR 7
13602.01887-03-291889-06-17 0.00.0 CIRR 8
13606.01887-04-021889-06-17 0.00.0 CIRR 9
13633.01887-04-291889-06-17 0.00.0 CIRR 10
13686.01887-06-211889-06-17 0.00.0 CIRR 11
14413.136061887-04-021901-04-12 0.00.0 CIRR 19
19415.187781901-05-311904-02-20 0.00.0 CIRR 41
21089.144131889-06-171908-03-20 2.00.0 CIRR 13
21089.157971893-04-011908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 15
21089.165271895-04-011908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 17
21089.168931896-04-011908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 18
21089.172581897-04-011908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 20
21089.176231898-04-011908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 21
21089.183531900-04-011908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 22
21089.187181901-04-011908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 23
21089.189751901-12-141908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 25
21089.190061902-01-141908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 24
21089.190831902-04-011908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 25
21089.198141904-04-011908-03-20 0.00.0 CIRR 27
24894.209091907-04-011920-08-28 0.8750.0 CIRR B26
25807.212641908-03-211930-02-10 0.00.0 CIRR 53, G53
31924.118911882-07-221954-03-20 0.00.0 CDOMSTK J6
31924.121131883-03-011954-03-20 0.00.0 CDOMSTK J8
31924.122691883-08-041954-03-20 1.50.0 CDOM J12
31924.127561884-12-031954-03-20 0.00.0 CDOMSTK J19

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 3,512 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 2,083 AF — 59% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 3,673 10th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 63 365 14.2
2011 4,585 15th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 364 19.5
2012 3,583 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 284 16.8
2013 3,512 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 278 13.6
2014 4,450 14th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 365 24.9
2015 4,449 13th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 365 16.0
2016 4,369 12th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 366 15.0
2017 2,813 4th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 365 15.4
2018 1,773 1st lowest of 15 · 50% of median 359 9.0
2019 3,219 5th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 365 13.0
2020 1,924 2nd lowest of 15 · 55% of median 358 15.0
2021 3,395 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 365 12.4
2022 3,856 11th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 365 12.0
2023 3,341 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 353 11.3
2024 2,083 3rd lowest of 15 · 59% of median 305 8.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 29 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 18571 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1969-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.