← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ENOS T HOTCHKISS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4000921 · 1 · LEROUX CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1886-03-01 — 1487th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ALBERT WEIR DITCH (1885-04-01). Immediately behind: FREY DITCH (1886-06-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29260.13209 | 1886-03-01 | 1937-05-28 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | H3 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 549 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 690 AF — 126% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 495 | 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 183 | 1.5 |
| 2007 | 715 | 14th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | 190 | 2.0 |
| 2008 | 494 | 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 165 | 3.0 |
| 2009 | 383 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 131 | 2.0 |
| 2010 | 425 | 4th lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 166 | 2.0 |
| 2011 | 325 | 1st lowest of 15 · 59% of median | 160 | 3.0 |
| 2012 | 549 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 184 | 2.0 |
| 2013 | 663 | 12th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 216 | 2.0 |
| 2014 | 448 | 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 158 | 2.0 |
| 2015 | 374 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 117 | 2.0 |
| 2016 | 813 | 15th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | 210 | 2.5 |
| 2017 | 563 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 145 | 2.5 |
| 2018 | 659 | 11th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 167 | 2.0 |
| 2019 | 580 | 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 142 | 2.5 |
| 2022 | 690 | 13th lowest of 15 · 126% of median | 175 | 2.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.