← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SNEPENGER DITCH NO 3

Structure dossier · WDID 4001047 · 1 · NORTH FORK GUNNISON RIVE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1930-04-011949th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SNEPENGER DITCH NO 1 (1930-04-01). Immediately behind: WEST HUBBARD DITCH (1931-07-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
38064.29311930-04-011964-01-31 1.00.0 CIRR K58

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 198 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2016, came in at 219 AF — 111% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2000 169 4th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 119 0.8
2001 249 12th lowest of 15 · 126% of median 148 1.0
2002 115 1st lowest of 15 · 58% of median 78 0.8
2003 180 5th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 134 0.8
2004 188 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 132 1.0
2005 188 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 120 1.0
2006 264 14th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 153 1.0
2007 198 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 106 1.0
2008 220 11th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 112 1.0
2009 218 9th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 134 1.0
2010 296 15th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 152 1.0
2011 263 13th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 108 1.5
2012 159 2nd lowest of 15 · 80% of median 162 0.5
2015 165 3rd lowest of 15 · 83% of median 116 0.8
2016 219 10th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 136 1.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.