← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LARSON NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4001166 · 1 · COW CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 04:35 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1919-07-011794th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BIG MONITOR RESERVOIR NO. 2 (1918-04-26). Immediately behind: J M BEAL SEEP DITCH (1920-04-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
31924.253831919-07-011954-03-20 5.150.0 CIRRDOM J170, J171

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 21 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 222 15th lowest of 15 · 1057% of median 88 2.0
2011 164 14th lowest of 15 · 781% of median 58 1.5
2012 61 10th lowest of 15 · 290% of median 33 1.0
2013 1 4th lowest of 15 · 5% of median 3 0.5
2014 81 13th lowest of 15 · 386% of median 39 2.0
2015 61 10th lowest of 15 · 290% of median 50 1.6
2016 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2017 12 6th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 19 0.6
2018 11 5th lowest of 15 · 52% of median 28 0.2
2019 59 9th lowest of 15 · 281% of median 30 1.8
2020 15 7th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 34 0.4
2021 75 12th lowest of 15 · 357% of median 53 1.4
2022 21 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 37 0.8
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4525 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 40% of the irrigation seasons in 1971-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.