← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

VALLEY VIEW DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4001235 · 1 · DIRTY GEORGE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1948-08-011872nd most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BECKWITH DITCH (1948-07-16). Immediately behind: BUZZARD DITCH NO 1 (1948-08-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
36007.01948-08-011954-03-20 2.50.0 CIRRDOM J322, J323

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 20 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 14 7th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 23 1.0
2011 245 15th lowest of 15 · 1225% of median 70 2.2
2012 2 5th lowest of 15 · 10% of median 21 1.0
2013 57 9th lowest of 15 · 285% of median 35 1.2
2014 95 10th lowest of 15 · 475% of median 58 1.8
2015 166 14th lowest of 15 · 830% of median 93 2.0
2016 138 13th lowest of 15 · 690% of median 62 2.9
2017 111 11th lowest of 15 · 555% of median 57 2.2
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2019 12 6th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 15 1.2
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 9 0.0
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2022 20 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 16 1.5
2023 128 12th lowest of 15 · 640% of median 133 1.2
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 9 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3743 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 35% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.