← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BROAD AX DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4001341 · 1 · GUNNISON RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 05:26 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1968-04-112156th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LOVELESS DOM PL (1968-03-22). Immediately behind: HARTZELL WELL (1969-01-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
43200.01968-04-111969-08-11 6.00.0 CIRR L108

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 168 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 244 AF — 145% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 1,868 15th lowest of 15 · 1112% of median 158 6.0
2011 1,773 14th lowest of 15 · 1055% of median 200 6.0
2012 87 5th lowest of 15 · 52% of median 34 2.0
2013 168 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 57 3.0
2014 75 4th lowest of 15 · 45% of median 40 3.5
2015 308 13th lowest of 15 · 183% of median 68 4.0
2016 149 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 52 4.0
2017 47 3rd lowest of 15 · 28% of median 38 2.7
2018 180 10th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 102 1.0
2019 15 2nd lowest of 15 · 9% of median 23 0.8
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2021 194 11th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 34 4.0
2022 106 6th lowest of 15 · 63% of median 60 1.6
2023 178 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 102 1.0
2024 244 12th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 87 1.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3625 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 46% of the irrigation seasons in 1988-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.