Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
FRUITLAND DOMESTIC PL
Structure dossier · WDID 4001856 · 1 · CRYSTAL CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 03:01 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1883-10-24 — 104th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CEDAR CANYON IRON SPRINGS DITCH (1883-10-24). Immediately behind: FRUITLAND MESA DOM WL #1 (1883-10-24).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12350.0 | 1883-10-24 | 1889-06-17 | 0.4 | 0.0 | C | DOMSTK |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
W3468, 96CW0115.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
W3468 | 1 | 1889-06-17 | O |
96CW0115 | 2 | 1889-06-17 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 10 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 201 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2005, came in at 169 AF — 84% of that, and 4th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 23 | 1st lowest of 10 · 11% of median | 61 | 0.2 |
| 1997 | 124 | 3rd lowest of 10 · 62% of median | 365 | 0.2 |
| 1998 | 81 | 2nd lowest of 10 · 40% of median | 365 | 0.3 |
| 1999 | 199 | 5th lowest of 10 · 99% of median | 365 | 0.3 |
| 2000 | 210 | 7th lowest of 10 · 104% of median | 366 | 0.3 |
| 2001 | 234 | 8th lowest of 10 · 116% of median | 365 | 0.4 |
| 2002 | 297 | 10th lowest of 10 · 148% of median | 365 | 0.4 |
| 2003 | 263 | 9th lowest of 10 · 131% of median | 365 | 0.4 |
| 2004 | 203 | 6th lowest of 10 · 101% of median | 366 | 0.3 |
| 2005 | 169 | 4th lowest of 10 · 84% of median | 304 | 0.3 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 10 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 3287 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1996-2005 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.