Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LONE CABIN TRANSFER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4001977 · 1 · SOUTH FORK MINNESOTA CRE · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 03:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1957-08-01 — 4041st most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WONDERS DITCH (1954-09-30). Immediately behind: C-ONE'S POND (1966-06-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57343.39294 | 1957-08-01 | 2007-12-31 | 6.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRSTK |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
07CW0095.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
07CW0095 | 1 | 2007-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 12 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 283 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 181 AF — 64% of that, and 4th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 363 | 9th lowest of 12 · 128% of median | 363 | 60 | 4.0 |
| 2014 | 415 | 11th lowest of 12 · 147% of median | 87 | 112 | 3.0 |
| 2015 | 456 | 12th lowest of 12 · 161% of median | 277 | 106 | 5.0 |
| 2016 | 286 | 7th lowest of 12 · 101% of median | 0 | 63 | 4.0 |
| 2017 | 337 | 8th lowest of 12 · 119% of median | 68 | 106 | 3.0 |
| 2018 | 41 | 1st lowest of 12 · 14% of median | — | 14 | 2.0 |
| 2019 | 266 | 5th lowest of 12 · 94% of median | — | 83 | 3.5 |
| 2020 | 93 | 3rd lowest of 12 · 33% of median | — | 19 | 4.0 |
| 2021 | 45 | 2nd lowest of 12 · 16% of median | — | 9 | 3.5 |
| 2022 | 409 | 10th lowest of 12 · 144% of median | — | 65 | 4.0 |
| 2023 | 280 | 6th lowest of 12 · 99% of median | — | 76 | 2.9 |
| 2024 | 181 | 4th lowest of 12 · 64% of median | — | 36 | 3.3 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 12 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 749 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 31% of the irrigation seasons in 2013-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.