← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

NEW GELWICKS DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4006515 · 1 · COTTONWOOD CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:26 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 2006-05-064200th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NATE SPRING (2003-11-15). Immediately behind: GRAND MESA BIBLE CHURCH W/W DITCH (2008-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
58804.571042006-05-062011-12-31 1.250.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 15 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 21 AF — 140% of that, and 7th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2014 30 9th lowest of 11 · 200% of median 34 0.5
2015 22 8th lowest of 11 · 147% of median 52 0.4
2016 15 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 72 0.2
2017 5 4th lowest of 11 · 33% of median 46 0.1
2018 3 3rd lowest of 11 · 20% of median 29 0.1
2019 14 5th lowest of 11 · 93% of median 67 0.2
2020 66 10th lowest of 11 · 440% of median 99 0.5
2021 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2022 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2023 155 11th lowest of 11 · 1033% of median 89 1.0
2024 21 7th lowest of 11 · 140% of median 43 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 534 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 25% of the irrigation seasons in 2014-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.