Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BEACH NO 2 D
Structure dossier · WDID 4100505 · 1 · UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1911-09-02 — 106th most senior of the 1104 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BEACH NO 1 D (1911-09-02). Immediately behind: CEDAR PARK DITCH (1911-09-02).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24221.22524 | 1911-09-02 | 1929-07-03 | 1.17 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 132 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 182 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2016, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 240 | 12th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 109 | 1.8 |
| 1995 | 230 | 11th lowest of 15 · 126% of median | 116 | 1.5 |
| 1996 | 185 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 112 | 1.3 |
| 1997 | 262 | 13th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | 139 | 1.2 |
| 1998 | 190 | 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median | 80 | 1.5 |
| 1999 | 178 | 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 143 | 1.0 |
| 2000 | 94 | 4th lowest of 15 · 52% of median | 50 | 1.0 |
| 2001 | 396 | 15th lowest of 15 · 218% of median | 134 | 1.5 |
| 2010 | 182 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 30 | 4.0 |
| 2011 | 393 | 14th lowest of 15 · 216% of median | 62 | 3.6 |
| 2012 | 99 | 5th lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 32 | 2.0 |
| 2013 | 54 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 30% of median | 34 | 1.0 |
| 2014 | 125 | 6th lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 29 | 3.0 |
| 2015 | 44 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 24% of median | 23 | 2.0 |
| 2016 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 7 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.