Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
4100514
Structure dossier · WDID 4100514 · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:43 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1913-03-01 — 127th most senior of the 1104 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MOCK RESERVOIR NO 1 (1911-09-02). Immediately behind: RUNDELL DITCH (1900-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24221.2307 | 1913-03-01 | 1929-07-03 | 7.28 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 157 |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
06CW0070, CA3728.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
06CW0070 | 1 | 2006-12-31 | S |
CA3728 | 2 | 1929-07-03 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 230 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2003, came in at 1 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 95 | 4th lowest of 15 · 41% of median | 25 | 2.0 |
| 1967 | 21 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 9% of median | 28 | 0.4 |
| 1968 | 143 | 5th lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 33 | 3.0 |
| 1969 | 204 | 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 46 | 4.0 |
| 1970 | 237 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 59 | 3.0 |
| 1971 | 292 | 11th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | 63 | 3.0 |
| 1972 | 62 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 27% of median | 23 | 1.5 |
| 1973 | 230 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 46 | 5.0 |
| 1974 | 244 | 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 59 | 3.0 |
| 1978 | 417 | 13th lowest of 15 · 181% of median | 25 | 10.5 |
| 1979 | 716 | 14th lowest of 15 · 311% of median | 185 | 2.0 |
| 1980 | 1,336 | 15th lowest of 15 · 581% of median | 178 | 6.5 |
| 1987 | 415 | 12th lowest of 15 · 180% of median | 61 | 5.0 |
| 1999 | 143 | 5th lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 42 | 2.0 |
| 2003 | 1 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 9 | 0.1 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | partial | missing name, structure type, water source |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1202 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 11% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2003 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.