Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DICAMILLO DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4100803 · 1 · CEDAR CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:57 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1949-05-01 — 449th most senior of the 1104 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DOMENICK DELTONDO DITCH (1947-03-20). Immediately behind: DON'S DITCH (1950-03-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
47847.36281949-05-011981-12-31 0.50.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 61 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1997, came in at 204 AF — 334% of that, and 11th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1987 124 10th lowest of 11 · 203% of median 139 0.8
1988 64 7th lowest of 11 · 105% of median 73 0.5
1989 61 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 63 0.5
1990 58 5th lowest of 11 · 95% of median 62 0.5
1991 47 3rd lowest of 11 · 77% of median 52 0.5
1992 90 9th lowest of 11 · 148% of median 95 0.5
1993 47 3rd lowest of 11 · 77% of median 55 0.5
1994 23 1st lowest of 11 · 38% of median 50 0.2
1995 69 8th lowest of 11 · 113% of median 73 0.5
1996 32 2nd lowest of 11 · 52% of median 35 0.5
1997 204 11th lowest of 11 · 334% of median 55 3.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 752 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 34% of the irrigation seasons in 1987-1997 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.