← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SHROPSHIRE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4200544 · 1 · WHITEWATER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1897-10-01 — 215th most senior of the 726 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RIO DOMINGUEZ DITCH (1892-02-29). Immediately behind: REDLANDS POWER CANAL (1905-07-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22283.17441 | 1897-10-01 | 1912-07-22 | 3.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 229 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 27 AF — 12% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 229 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 152 | 2.5 |
| 2009 | 609 | 15th lowest of 15 · 266% of median | 192 | 3.1 |
| 2010 | 435 | 13th lowest of 15 · 190% of median | 181 | 2.3 |
| 2011 | 390 | 12th lowest of 15 · 170% of median | 157 | 3.7 |
| 2012 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | 184 | 6th lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 133 | 1.5 |
| 2014 | 245 | 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median | 177 | 1.5 |
| 2015 | 319 | 11th lowest of 15 · 139% of median | 206 | 4.1 |
| 2016 | 315 | 10th lowest of 15 · 138% of median | 119 | 3.1 |
| 2017 | 36 | 4th lowest of 15 · 16% of median | 76 | 0.5 |
| 2018 | 205 | 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 140 | 2.2 |
| 2019 | 540 | 14th lowest of 15 · 236% of median | 145 | 4.7 |
| 2020 | 170 | 5th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 200 | 0.8 |
| 2021 | 15 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 7% of median | 34 | 0.2 |
| 2022 | 27 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 12% of median | 74 | 0.4 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.