Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ANDERSON RES NO 2
Structure dossier · WDID 4203601 · 3 · KANNAH CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1928-10-05 — 270th most senior of the 726 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HALLENBECK RES #2 (1923-10-17). Immediately behind: HELMKE DITCH (1929-04-01).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30895.28767 | 1928-10-05 | 1941-07-25 | 433.36 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNDOMSTK | |
| 34419.28767 | 1928-10-05 | 1959-07-21 | 135.04 | 0.0 | A | IRRDOMSTK |
Legal record & documents
10 decreed actions on record across
5 court cases:
93CW0260, 14CW3090, CA8303, CA5812, 93CW0260A.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
93CW0260 | 1 | 1993-12-31 | S |
14CW3090 | 1 | 1993-12-31 | S |
CA8303 | 2 | 1959-07-21 | S |
CA5812 | 2 | 1941-07-25 | S |
93CW0260A | 4 | 1941-07-25 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 6 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 305 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1993, came in at 305 AF — 100% of that, and 1st lowest of the 1 year with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | — | no recorded volume | 21 | 0 | — |
| 1993 | 305 | 1st lowest of 1 · 100% of median | — | 15 | 11.0 |
| 1994 | — | no recorded volume | 463 | 0 | — |
| 1996 | — | no recorded volume | 582 | 0 | — |
| 2016 | — | no recorded volume | 194 | 0 | — |
| 2020 | — | no recorded volume | 169 | 0 | — |
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | fragment | 15 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history) |
| record continuity | unknown | record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days) |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.