Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CAMPBELL CREEK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4300565 · 1 · UTE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1960-08-02 — 1238th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SMITH WELL 6 (1960-07-15). Immediately behind: TERLEP WELL (1960-08-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40391.0 | 1960-08-02 | 1966-11-21 | 8.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRFISDOM | 680 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,034 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 705 AF — 68% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 1,623 | 13th lowest of 15 · 157% of median | 158 | 8.0 |
| 2006 | 2,160 | 15th lowest of 15 · 209% of median | 174 | 8.0 |
| 2007 | 672 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 65% of median | 135 | 3.0 |
| 2008 | 926 | 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 139 | 4.5 |
| 2009 | 1,404 | 11th lowest of 15 · 136% of median | 126 | 8.0 |
| 2010 | 1,208 | 9th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 140 | 6.0 |
| 2011 | 1,388 | 10th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 125 | 6.0 |
| 2012 | 1,630 | 14th lowest of 15 · 158% of median | 176 | 6.0 |
| 2016 | 346 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 34% of median | 81 | 2.5 |
| 2017 | 161 | 1st lowest of 15 · 16% of median | 66 | 1.5 |
| 2021 | 822 | 6th lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 159 | 3.9 |
| 2022 | 1,446 | 12th lowest of 15 · 140% of median | 277 | 5.0 |
| 2023 | 1,034 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 365 | 3.0 |
| 2024 | 729 | 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 366 | 2.5 |
| 2025 | 705 | 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 304 | 2.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.