Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CASPER PIPELINE

Structure dossier · WDID 4300569 · 7 · NORTH FORK WHITE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:45 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1961-11-30 — 1264th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STRAWBERRY CREEK RES (1961-10-31). Immediately behind: C D C PIPELINE (1961-11-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
40876.01961-11-301966-11-21 0.10.0 CIRRDOM 708

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 15 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2011, came in at 25 AF — 167% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1995 16 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 173 0.1
1996 12 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median 177 0.0
1997 12 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median 180 0.0
1998 11 2nd lowest of 15 · 73% of median 174 0.0
1999 12 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median 181 0.0
2000 12 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median 191 0.0
2001 12 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median 184 0.0
2002 24 10th lowest of 15 · 160% of median 237 0.1
2003 36 15th lowest of 15 · 240% of median 365 0.1
2004 30 14th lowest of 15 · 200% of median 305 0.1
2005 15 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 153 0.1
2008 10 1st lowest of 15 · 67% of median 241 0.0
2009 24 10th lowest of 15 · 160% of median 365 0.1
2010 24 10th lowest of 15 · 160% of median 308 0.1
2011 25 13th lowest of 15 · 167% of median 159 0.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4732 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1989-2011 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.