← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DAUM DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4300596 · 1 · DAUM DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1887-05-101186th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HARP WELL NO 1 (1958-06-20). Immediately behind: BIG LICK RES (1903-12-04).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
39776.136441887-05-101966-11-21 2.730.0 CIRRRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG 603

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 373 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 287 AF — 77% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 220 6th lowest of 15 · 59% of median 125 1.0
2011 172 5th lowest of 15 · 46% of median 75 1.5
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2013 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2016 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2017 373 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 32 7.2
2018 990 13th lowest of 15 · 265% of median 109 5.9
2019 612 10th lowest of 15 · 164% of median 57 8.2
2020 467 9th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 47 5.1
2021 661 12th lowest of 15 · 177% of median 94 4.4
2022 1,032 14th lowest of 15 · 277% of median 114 5.9
2023 630 11th lowest of 15 · 169% of median 85 3.8
2024 1,742 15th lowest of 15 · 467% of median 172 6.6
2025 287 7th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 50 3.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.