← My Water · Print / save as PDF
DOUGHTY DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4300606 · 1 · WILDHACK CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1909-04-17 — 710th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KISSINGER DITCH (1906-04-21). Immediately behind: ESSIE JANES DITCH (1906-07-26).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23257.21656 | 1909-04-17 | 1913-09-06 | 0.02 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 207 |
| 23257.22021 | 1910-04-17 | 1913-09-06 | 0.18 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 208 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 23 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 11 | 6th lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 29 | 0.2 |
| 2005 | 23 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 25 | 0.5 |
| 2006 | 71 | 13th lowest of 15 · 309% of median | 47 | 1.5 |
| 2007 | 35 | 9th lowest of 15 · 152% of median | 39 | 0.5 |
| 2008 | 48 | 10th lowest of 15 · 209% of median | 49 | 0.5 |
| 2009 | 113 | 14th lowest of 15 · 491% of median | 58 | 1.0 |
| 2010 | 55 | 12th lowest of 15 · 239% of median | 79 | 0.5 |
| 2012 | 2 | 4th lowest of 15 · 9% of median | 7 | 0.2 |
| 2014 | 8 | 5th lowest of 15 · 35% of median | 22 | 0.2 |
| 2016 | 50 | 11th lowest of 15 · 217% of median | 43 | 0.6 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2023 | 285 | 15th lowest of 15 · 1239% of median | 107 | 2.0 |
| 2024 | 13 | 7th lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 14 | 0.5 |
| 2025 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.