Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
PUTINI LAKE FEEDER D
Structure dossier · WDID 4300885 · 1 · WHITE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:45 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1955-05-29 — 1163rd most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PHILLIPS DITCH (1955-05-29). Immediately behind: WHEELER DITCH (1955-05-29).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38499.0 | 1955-05-29 | 1958-11-26 | 3.76 | 0.0 | C | RECFIS | 573 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,327 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 1,206 | 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 304 | 2.0 |
| 1996 | 948 | 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median | 239 | 2.0 |
| 1997 | 1,206 | 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 304 | 2.0 |
| 1998 | 920 | 4th lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 232 | 2.0 |
| 1999 | 1,448 | 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 365 | 2.0 |
| 2000 | 1,452 | 12th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 366 | 2.0 |
| 2001 | 1,327 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 365 | 2.0 |
| 2002 | 682 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 51% of median | 304 | 2.5 |
| 2003 | 1,349 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 230 | 3.8 |
| 2004 | 2,517 | 15th lowest of 15 · 190% of median | 366 | 3.8 |
| 2005 | 1,448 | 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 365 | 2.0 |
| 2006 | 1,838 | 13th lowest of 15 · 138% of median | 304 | 3.8 |
| 2009 | 455 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 34% of median | 61 | 3.8 |
| 2010 | 2,267 | 14th lowest of 15 · 171% of median | 304 | 3.8 |
| 2023 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.