← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WEST STEWART RES DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4301139 · 1 · WEST FORK STEWART GULCH · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1895-03-01983rd most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PENNELL INTAKE OF CHASE AND COLTHORP DIT (1893-03-01). Immediately behind: WEST STEWART GULCH RES (1895-03-02).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
32172.164961895-03-011942-05-26 0.780.0 CIRR 367
32172.245921917-05-011942-05-26 1.820.0 CIRR 467Y

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 66 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 335 AF — 508% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1999 66 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 57 2.0
2000 49 6th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 55 0.5
2001 110 11th lowest of 15 · 167% of median 104 1.5
2002 78 10th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 35 1.8
2003 71 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 47 1.0
2007 234 12th lowest of 15 · 354% of median 60 2.0
2008 27 4th lowest of 15 · 41% of median 27 0.6
2010 239 13th lowest of 15 · 362% of median 65 2.0
2014 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2016 27 4th lowest of 15 · 41% of median 62 0.2
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2023 56 7th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 23 1.7
2024 244 14th lowest of 15 · 370% of median 36 5.1
2025 335 15th lowest of 15 · 508% of median 37 5.4

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.