← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DIETZ SPRING NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 4301547 · 4 · WEST WILLOW CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1959-03-311677th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DOBBS SPG NO 1 (1958-12-31). Immediately behind: DIETZ SPG POND 1 (1959-03-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
45290.399011959-03-311974-12-31 0.50.0 CIRRFISSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 22 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2017, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1998 143 15th lowest of 15 · 650% of median 75 1.0
1999 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2000 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2001 12 6th lowest of 15 · 54% of median 68 0.1
2002 72 13th lowest of 15 · 327% of median 365 0.1
2003 60 12th lowest of 15 · 273% of median 304 0.1
2004 33 9th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 169 0.1
2005 22 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 28 0.5
2007 45 10th lowest of 15 · 204% of median 91 0.2
2008 11 5th lowest of 15 · 50% of median 24 0.2
2010 18 7th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 53 0.2
2012 48 11th lowest of 15 · 218% of median 49 0.5
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2016 73 14th lowest of 15 · 332% of median 147 0.2
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.