← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LITTLE HILLS SPG NO 3

Structure dossier · WDID 4302112 · 4 · PICEANCE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1920-09-011809th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FOOTE POND SPG (1920-09-01). Immediately behind: YELLOW CREEK RES NO 1 (1940-09-01).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
46386.258111920-09-011977-12-31 1.50.0 CIRRRECFISWLD
56231.02003-12-152003-12-31 0.01.0 CIRRCOMINDFIRSTKWLD

Recorded use (last 9 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 0 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 0 AF — —% of that, and 1st lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 52 7th lowest of 9 · —% of median 110 0.2
2010 77 9th lowest of 9 · —% of median 151 0.5
2011 26 6th lowest of 9 · —% of median 19 1.0
2014 66 8th lowest of 9 · —% of median 135 0.2
2015 0 1st lowest of 9 · —% of median 3 0.0
2016 0 1st lowest of 9 · —% of median 3 0.0
2017 0 1st lowest of 9 · —% of median 1 0.0
2023 0 1st lowest of 9 · —% of median 1 0.0
2024 0 1st lowest of 9 · —% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 424 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 13% of the irrigation seasons in 2009-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.