← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DECEPTION CR DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4401088 · 1 · DECEPTION CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1901-08-06836th most senior of the 3562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ELKHEAD DOMESTIC WELL (1974-10-02). Immediately behind: FLAT TOP RES (1904-12-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
45655.188451901-08-061975-12-31 4.00.0 CIRRDOMSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 342 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 97 AF — 28% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2008 399 10th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 100 3.0
2009 470 12th lowest of 15 · 137% of median 93 4.0
2010 528 14th lowest of 15 · 154% of median 104 4.0
2011 578 15th lowest of 15 · 169% of median 261 3.0
2012 385 9th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 298 1.5
2013 485 13th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 365 1.5
2014 342 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 309 1.0
2015 461 11th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 304 2.0
2016 117 5th lowest of 15 · 34% of median 68 1.0
2017 238 7th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 121 1.0
2018 33 3rd lowest of 15 · 10% of median 86 0.2
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2020 224 6th lowest of 15 · 66% of median 49 2.4
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2022 97 4th lowest of 15 · 28% of median 67 0.9

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 6347 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 64% of the irrigation seasons in 1977-2023 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.