← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

D D & E RES

Structure dossier · WDID 4403689 · 3 · MILK CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:57 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1888-07-17455th most senior of the 3562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PYRAMID DITCH (1916-06-01). Immediately behind: HAMILL WELL 3 (1932-05-10).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
29498.140781888-07-171931-10-26 400.820.0 AIRRDOM 43A
36295.337581942-06-051960-09-01 1007.220.0 AIRRDOM 7

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 310 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2016, came in at 308 AF — 100% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 4 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2005 no recorded volume 603 0
2008 no recorded volume 730 0
2009 no recorded volume 998 0
2010 no recorded volume 708 0
2011 no recorded volume 539 0
2012 311 3rd lowest of 4 · 100% of median 1,099 16 14.1
2013 692 4th lowest of 4 · 224% of median 821 42 13.6
2014 306 1st lowest of 4 · 99% of median 711 14 32.2
2015 no recorded volume 662 0
2016 308 2nd lowest of 4 · 100% of median 732 28 10.6
2020 no recorded volume 960 0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record fragment 100 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history)
record continuity unknown record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days)
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.