← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HELEN AND LEE SPG AND PL

Structure dossier · WDID 4500624 · 4 · DIVIDE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:03 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1958-08-11405th most senior of the 1378 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ELLIS SPRING & PIPELINE (1958-07-01). Immediately behind: EATON WELL NO 1 (1959-11-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
39669.01958-08-111965-07-09 0.420.0 CIRRDOM 263

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 12 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1998, came in at 4 AF — 33% of that, and 1st lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1987 54 12th lowest of 12 · 450% of median 197 0.4
1988 19 10th lowest of 12 · 158% of median 32 0.4
1989 15 9th lowest of 12 · 125% of median 73 0.4
1990 49 11th lowest of 12 · 408% of median 214 0.2
1991 6 2nd lowest of 12 · 50% of median 104 0.0
1992 12 6th lowest of 12 · 100% of median 207 0.0
1993 12 6th lowest of 12 · 100% of median 201 0.0
1994 7 3rd lowest of 12 · 58% of median 187 0.0
1995 12 6th lowest of 12 · 100% of median 16 0.4
1996 7 3rd lowest of 12 · 58% of median 33 0.4
1997 8 5th lowest of 12 · 67% of median 36 0.4
1998 4 1st lowest of 12 · 33% of median 6 0.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1306 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 55% of the irrigation seasons in 1987-1998 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.