Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BADGER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4700503 · 1 · CROSBY CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:24 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1921-10-05 — 554th most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ASPIN DITCH (1921-06-07). Immediately behind: BUTTE RES (1922-06-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30280.2621 | 1921-10-05 | 1939-06-20 | 6.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 724 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 249 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 276 | 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 54 | 4.0 |
| 2005 | 385 | 12th lowest of 15 · 155% of median | 70 | 4.0 |
| 2006 | 349 | 11th lowest of 15 · 140% of median | 70 | 4.0 |
| 2007 | 227 | 5th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 62 | 4.5 |
| 2008 | 216 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 50 | 3.2 |
| 2009 | 220 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 48 | 4.0 |
| 2010 | 539 | 14th lowest of 15 · 216% of median | 59 | 6.0 |
| 2013 | 662 | 15th lowest of 15 · 266% of median | 98 | 5.0 |
| 2014 | 232 | 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 43 | 4.0 |
| 2015 | 500 | 13th lowest of 15 · 201% of median | 57 | 5.0 |
| 2016 | 249 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 38 | 3.5 |
| 2017 | 220 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 29 | 4.0 |
| 2018 | 238 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 56 | 3.2 |
| 2019 | 285 | 10th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 51 | 3.2 |
| 2024 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.