← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NEWTON DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4900525 · 1 · SOUTH FORK REPUBLICAN RI · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1904-07-15 — 19th most senior of the 39 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: AUSTIN DITCH (1894-11-22). Immediately behind: AMY R FOOTE RES (1906-07-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19919.0 | 1904-07-15 | 1938-09-08 | 7.15 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
CA4433, CA2985.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA4433 | 2 | 1938-09-08 | S |
CA2985 | 1 | 1938-09-08 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 12 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,582 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2001, came in at 45 AF — 3% of that, and 1st lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,117 | 4th lowest of 12 · 71% of median | 150 | 13.3 |
| 1975 | 1,004 | 3rd lowest of 12 · 64% of median | 104 | 12.8 |
| 1976 | 1,370 | 5th lowest of 12 · 87% of median | 145 | 9.5 |
| 1978 | 1,717 | 8th lowest of 12 · 109% of median | 166 | 13.3 |
| 1979 | 1,529 | 6th lowest of 12 · 97% of median | 170 | 13.6 |
| 1980 | 2,471 | 9th lowest of 12 · 156% of median | 179 | 7.0 |
| 1981 | 4,223 | 10th lowest of 12 · 267% of median | 199 | 12.0 |
| 1982 | 5,637 | 12th lowest of 12 · 356% of median | 214 | 14.3 |
| 1983 | 4,665 | 11th lowest of 12 · 295% of median | 169 | 14.0 |
| 1984 | 1,634 | 7th lowest of 12 · 103% of median | 134 | 12.0 |
| 2000 | 194 | 2nd lowest of 12 · 12% of median | 30 | 3.5 |
| 2001 | 45 | 1st lowest of 12 · 3% of median | 22 | 1.5 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 12 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1682 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 29% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-2001 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.