← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MCMAHON DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5000617 · 1 · RED DIRT CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:01 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1884-08-15 — 14th most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: INFANGER DITCH NO 2 (1884-08-15). Immediately behind: TYLER DITCH (1884-08-15).
Decreed rights (8)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12646.0 | 1884-08-15 | 1906-08-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 13 |
| 13778.0 | 1887-09-21 | 1906-08-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 31 |
| 22494.22423 | 1911-05-24 | 1915-03-20 | 3400.0 | 0.0 | A | IRR | 122 |
| 22494.22423 | 1911-05-24 | 1915-03-20 | 36.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 122 |
| 31393.23162 | 1913-06-01 | 1938-07-13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 150 |
| 31393.25672 | 1920-04-15 | 1938-07-13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 153 |
| 49403.0 | 1985-04-05 | 1985-12-31 | 622.0 | 0.0 | A | IRR | |
| 49403.0 | 1985-04-05 | 1985-12-31 | 36.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,967 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 2,924 AF — 99% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2,658 | 5th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 67 | 35.8 |
| 2011 | 2,765 | 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 87 | 37.4 |
| 2012 | 2,526 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 85% of median | 78 | 25.0 |
| 2013 | 3,431 | 12th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 67 | 32.0 |
| 2014 | 3,075 | 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median | 61 | 36.1 |
| 2015 | 2,967 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 59 | 44.2 |
| 2016 | 2,544 | 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 44 | 33.0 |
| 2017 | 3,513 | 13th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 64 | 35.0 |
| 2018 | 3,079 | 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median | 51 | 39.3 |
| 2019 | 2,288 | 1st lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 97 | 27.0 |
| 2020 | 3,839 | 14th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | 119 | 36.3 |
| 2021 | 2,520 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 85% of median | 125 | 35.5 |
| 2022 | 3,156 | 11th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 131 | 34.0 |
| 2023 | 10,896 | 15th lowest of 15 · 367% of median | 164 | 56.6 |
| 2024 | 2,924 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 59 | 31.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.