← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ROUND CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5000639 · 1 · ROUND CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1896-06-0157th most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: P J MARTIN DITCH (1896-05-25). Immediately behind: PINTO CREEK DITCH (1896-12-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16954.01896-06-011906-08-11 0.330.0 CIRR 58

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 44 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 22 AF — 50% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2005 89 11th lowest of 15 · 202% of median 120 0.5
2006 38 7th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 40 0.5
2007 44 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 43 0.6
2008 106 13th lowest of 15 · 241% of median 123 0.8
2009 490 15th lowest of 15 · 1114% of median 137 8.4
2010 90 12th lowest of 15 · 204% of median 71 0.8
2011 143 14th lowest of 15 · 325% of median 125 1.2
2012 11 1st lowest of 15 · 25% of median 19 0.3
2013 62 9th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 47 0.9
2014 71 10th lowest of 15 · 161% of median 44 0.9
2015 36 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 24 0.8
2016 16 2nd lowest of 15 · 36% of median 17 0.5
2017 36 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 21 0.9
2018 31 4th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 32 0.5
2019 22 3rd lowest of 15 · 50% of median 33 0.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.