← My Water · Print / save as PDF
DEBERARD DITCH OVERFLOW SYSTEM
Structure dossier · WDID 5000734 · 1 · MUDDY CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1883-06-05 — 8th most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HERDE DITCH (1883-06-05). Immediately behind: MUDDY CREEK PUMP STATION (1883-06-05).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12209.0 | 1883-06-05 | 1906-08-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRFISFIRSTKAUGOTHWLD | 11 |
| 30506.14397 | 1889-06-01 | 1935-12-14 | 15.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 148 |
| 33025.0 | 1940-06-02 | 1941-07-17 | 44.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 186, 41 |
| 34762.13122 | 1885-12-04 | 1964-09-05 | 21.15 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOMSTK | |
| 55152.55133 | 2000-12-12 | 2001-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRFISFIRSTKAUGOTHWLD | |
| 55152.55133 | 2000-12-12 | 2001-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRFISFIRSTKAUGOTHWLD |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 4,602 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 4,417 AF — 96% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 4,163 | 4th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 57 | 70.0 |
| 2011 | 4,215 | 5th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 32 | 80.0 |
| 2012 | 5,401 | 13th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 85 | 50.0 |
| 2013 | 5,124 | 10th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 83 | 65.5 |
| 2014 | 3,888 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 60 | 65.0 |
| 2015 | 5,351 | 12th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 82 | 75.0 |
| 2016 | 6,635 | 15th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | 88 | 65.0 |
| 2017 | 4,286 | 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 44 | 78.5 |
| 2018 | 5,704 | 14th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | 90 | 69.5 |
| 2019 | 3,084 | 1st lowest of 15 · 67% of median | 58 | 60.0 |
| 2020 | 4,602 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 65 | 65.0 |
| 2021 | 3,660 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 79 | 60.0 |
| 2022 | 5,207 | 11th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 146 | 60.0 |
| 2023 | 4,967 | 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 105 | 60.0 |
| 2024 | 4,417 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 116 | 72.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.