← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MCQUEARY NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5100819 · 1 · WILLOW CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:42 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1904-06-30160th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JUST NO 5 DITCH (1904-06-10). Immediately behind: REINHARDT NO 1 DITCH (1904-09-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19904.01904-06-301906-08-11 3.00.0 CIRR 142

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 190 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 308 13th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 54 3.6
2010 190 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 49 3.5
2011 60 4th lowest of 15 · 32% of median 21 3.0
2012 382 14th lowest of 15 · 201% of median 75 4.5
2013 230 9th lowest of 15 · 121% of median 53 3.5
2014 157 7th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 36 4.0
2015 139 6th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 30 4.1
2016 299 12th lowest of 15 · 157% of median 48 4.8
2017 274 11th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 58 4.5
2018 238 10th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 52 3.4
2019 899 15th lowest of 15 · 473% of median 47 13.0
2020 12 2nd lowest of 15 · 6% of median 29 0.3
2022 17 3rd lowest of 15 · 9% of median 14 4.4
2023 112 5th lowest of 15 · 59% of median 24 2.7
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 11 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2800 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 27% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.