← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LAVA CREEK NO 2 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5200588 · 1 · PINEY RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:38 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1905-05-16 — 123rd most senior of the 562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GIBSON NO 2 DITCH (1905-04-25). Immediately behind: NORTH GOODSON DITCH HDG1 (1905-06-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29437.20224 | 1905-05-16 | 1946-08-30 | 3.16 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 133 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 210 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 156 AF — 74% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 403 | 15th lowest of 15 · 192% of median | 89 | 3.2 |
| 1995 | 330 | 12th lowest of 15 · 157% of median | 72 | 3.2 |
| 1996 | 393 | 14th lowest of 15 · 187% of median | 81 | 3.1 |
| 1997 | 386 | 13th lowest of 15 · 184% of median | 56 | 3.5 |
| 1998 | 210 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 54 | 2.7 |
| 1999 | 116 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 55% of median | 36 | 2.0 |
| 2000 | 117 | 4th lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 52 | 1.3 |
| 2001 | 211 | 9th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 97 | 1.7 |
| 2003 | 306 | 11th lowest of 15 · 146% of median | 106 | 1.5 |
| 2004 | 199 | 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 106 | 1.2 |
| 2017 | 191 | 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 71 | 1.5 |
| 2018 | 226 | 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 156 | 2.1 |
| 2019 | 82 | 1st lowest of 15 · 39% of median | 46 | 1.2 |
| 2021 | 90 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 43% of median | 62 | 1.0 |
| 2023 | 156 | 5th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 155 | 0.6 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.