← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GROVER CLEVELAND DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5300596 · 1 · KING CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1885-04-1522nd most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BUFFALO HEAD DITCH (1885-04-15). Immediately behind: SUNNYSIDE DITCH (1885-04-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12889.01885-04-151890-11-20 7.80.0 CIRR 19

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 118 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 238 AF — 202% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 93 5th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 39 1.2
2008 83 3rd lowest of 15 · 70% of median 30 1.5
2009 118 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 51 1.5
2010 116 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 51 1.5
2011 180 10th lowest of 15 · 152% of median 70 1.9
2013 190 11th lowest of 15 · 161% of median 50 2.7
2014 52 1st lowest of 15 · 44% of median 116 0.2
2015 72 2nd lowest of 15 · 61% of median 36 1.3
2016 108 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 22 2.7
2017 91 4th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 25 3.3
2018 119 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 32 2.0
2019 440 14th lowest of 15 · 373% of median 35 8.0
2020 208 12th lowest of 15 · 176% of median 26 5.0
2023 534 15th lowest of 15 · 452% of median 42 9.5
2024 238 13th lowest of 15 · 202% of median 41 3.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.