← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HOLT NO 1 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5300625 · 1 · EGERIA CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:41 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1934-05-01 — 421st most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HAZZARD SPRING DITCH (1917-07-10). Immediately behind: CRESENT LAKE RESERVOIR (1935-11-18).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41199.30801 | 1934-05-01 | 1967-09-13 | 3.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 459 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 107 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2020, came in at 176 AF — 164% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 228 | 12th lowest of 15 · 213% of median | 99 | 1.5 |
| 1997 | 221 | 11th lowest of 15 · 206% of median | 69 | 1.6 |
| 1998 | 265 | 13th lowest of 15 · 248% of median | 90 | 1.5 |
| 1999 | 49 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 46% of median | 49 | 0.5 |
| 2000 | 46 | 1st lowest of 15 · 43% of median | 34 | 0.7 |
| 2001 | 53 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 53 | 0.5 |
| 2005 | 107 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 87 | 1.0 |
| 2006 | 83 | 7th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 83 | 0.5 |
| 2009 | 54 | 4th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 55 | 0.5 |
| 2010 | 62 | 5th lowest of 15 · 58% of median | 39 | 1.2 |
| 2012 | 70 | 6th lowest of 15 · 65% of median | 94 | 0.5 |
| 2013 | 793 | 15th lowest of 15 · 741% of median | 155 | 4.3 |
| 2016 | 375 | 14th lowest of 15 · 350% of median | 82 | 3.1 |
| 2019 | 142 | 9th lowest of 15 · 133% of median | 55 | 1.4 |
| 2020 | 176 | 10th lowest of 15 · 164% of median | 57 | 1.6 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.