← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MCKEAN DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5300722 · 1 · TOPONAS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:44 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1888-04-01119th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FORESTER WELL (1900-12-31). Immediately behind: MCKEAN NO 2 DITCH (1888-04-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19190.139711888-04-011904-11-14 1.00.0 CIRR 143

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 170 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 135 AF — 79% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 170 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 53 3.0
2010 326 13th lowest of 15 · 192% of median 64 3.2
2011 255 12th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 58 3.1
2012 30 1st lowest of 15 · 18% of median 16 1.0
2013 135 4th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 51 1.8
2015 222 9th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 64 2.7
2016 140 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 50 2.0
2017 240 10th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 62 3.3
2018 170 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 56 3.5
2019 251 11th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 87 1.5
2020 120 3rd lowest of 15 · 71% of median 29 2.5
2021 74 2nd lowest of 15 · 44% of median 76 2.5
2022 360 14th lowest of 15 · 212% of median 67 3.6
2023 384 15th lowest of 15 · 226% of median 71 3.5
2024 135 4th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 55 1.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3447 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 31% of the irrigation seasons in 1972-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.