Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NO NAME DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5300733 · 1 · EGERIA CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:21 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Will it be called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1890-05-12 — 93rd most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TUCKER NO 1 DITCH (1890-04-20). Immediately behind: PASS CREEK DITCH (1890-05-15).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14742.0 | 1890-05-12 | 1890-11-20 | 0.6 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 110 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 74 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 101 | 10th lowest of 15 · 136% of median | 87 | 0.6 |
| 2004 | 10 | 4th lowest of 15 · 14% of median | 11 | 0.5 |
| 2006 | 6 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 8% of median | 21 | 0.3 |
| 2009 | 206 | 14th lowest of 15 · 278% of median | 38 | 3.0 |
| 2010 | 48 | 7th lowest of 15 · 65% of median | 33 | 0.8 |
| 2011 | 390 | 15th lowest of 15 · 527% of median | 161 | 3.1 |
| 2012 | 74 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 80 | 0.9 |
| 2013 | 123 | 12th lowest of 15 · 166% of median | 84 | 1.0 |
| 2014 | 187 | 13th lowest of 15 · 253% of median | 92 | 2.0 |
| 2015 | 83 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 71 | 0.6 |
| 2016 | 118 | 11th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 71 | 1.1 |
| 2017 | 41 | 6th lowest of 15 · 55% of median | 21 | 1.2 |
| 2019 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 31 | 5th lowest of 15 · 42% of median | 12 | 1.4 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.