← My Water · Print / save as PDF
OAK GROVE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5300745 · 1 · CABIN CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:17 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1883-08-15 — 12th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BLANK DITCH (1883-07-31). Immediately behind: LINK DITCH (1883-09-01).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12280.0 | 1883-08-15 | 1890-11-20 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 6 |
| 12510.0 | 1884-04-01 | 1890-11-20 | 0.3 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 9A |
| 12663.0 | 1884-09-01 | 1890-11-20 | 6.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 13A |
| 12889.0 | 1885-04-15 | 1890-11-20 | 0.04 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 20 |
| 14821.0 | 1890-07-30 | 1890-11-20 | 2.36 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 139 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,158 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 3,488 AF — 162% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2,389 | 11th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 147 | 8.2 |
| 2005 | 2,158 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 137 | 8.0 |
| 2006 | 2,083 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 106 | 10.0 |
| 2007 | 1,349 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 69 | 10.0 |
| 2008 | 1,369 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 70 | 10.0 |
| 2009 | 1,749 | 5th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 100 | 10.0 |
| 2010 | 2,312 | 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median | 143 | 10.0 |
| 2011 | 2,531 | 12th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 148 | 10.0 |
| 2012 | 2,595 | 13th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 169 | 10.0 |
| 2013 | 972 | 1st lowest of 15 · 45% of median | 50 | 10.0 |
| 2015 | 1,511 | 4th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 171 | 8.2 |
| 2016 | 2,376 | 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 168 | 9.9 |
| 2017 | 2,041 | 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 163 | 10.2 |
| 2018 | 3,366 | 14th lowest of 15 · 156% of median | 164 | 14.2 |
| 2019 | 3,488 | 15th lowest of 15 · 162% of median | 106 | 16.8 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.