Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
TUKE NO 1 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5300843 · 1 · HORSE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:46 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1888-04-04 — 70th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SNODGRASS AND MANNERS D (1888-04-01). Immediately behind: BIG MESA DITCH (1888-04-15).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13974.0 | 1888-04-04 | 1890-11-20 | 0.7 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 72 |
Legal record & documents
2 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
CA1018, CA0295.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA1018 | 1 | 1890-11-20 | O |
CA0295 | 1 | 1890-11-20 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 8 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 160 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2018, came in at 10 AF — 6% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1953 | 690 | 8th lowest of 8 · 433% of median | 129 | 8.0 |
| 1975 | 155 | 4th lowest of 8 · 97% of median | 53 | 1.5 |
| 1976 | 164 | 5th lowest of 8 · 103% of median | 88 | 1.5 |
| 1977 | 0 | 1st lowest of 8 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1978 | 333 | 6th lowest of 8 · 209% of median | 112 | 1.5 |
| 1980 | 375 | 7th lowest of 8 · 235% of median | 126 | 1.5 |
| 1982 | 131 | 3rd lowest of 8 · 82% of median | 45 | 1.5 |
| 2018 | 10 | 2nd lowest of 8 · 6% of median | 25 | 0.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 8 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 579 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 4% of the irrigation seasons in 1953-2018 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.